go to jeppesen.com

Guidance material for operators from ICAO.

Biomathematical Fatigue Models Guidance Document providing overview of the capabilities of various models. 

Our appreciated one-pager allowing for more easily visualising what an FRMS is all about - in one single page. 

A paper describing best practice control of fatigue risk from network planning to follow-up.

The 2014 validation of the Three Process Model built into BAM. By many seen as the 'gold standard' for fatigue model validation, providing a 'full disclosure' including data.

...and physiology. Methodology for aligning a rule set to a more detailed representation of science as represented by a fatigue model.

An article about improving FTLs with a structured methodology.

A collection of potential actions targeting fatigue preventions and mitigations to consider for a FSAG. 

Reading predictions from a bio-mathematical fatigue model may not always be straightforward...

How much lower risk did the new EASA rules deliver? At what cost to the industry?

How much lower risk did the new EASA rules deliver? At what cost to the industry?

The approach for controlling fatigue risk for pilots and cabin crew has become much more sophisticated in recent years but the untapped potential is still significant...

Fatigue model comparison matrix useful when evaluating/comparing model capabilities.

An excellent paper reasoning upon fatigue risk and regulation

A paper describing best practice quantification of fatigue risk focused on the flights safety aspects reducing risk for lapses, slips, mistakes and violations.

Short guidance on different considerations when wishing to quickly adapt to an eastward time zone difference.

...optimization matters. Guidance on decision making in crew planning, avoiding the fallacy of confirmation bias and jumping to conclusions.

A Comprehensive Investigation of Flight and Duty Time Limitations and their Ability to Control Crew Fatigue

A comparison of three regulatory approaches - by quantification

Read here about the differences between two VERY different approaches to reducing risk.

How much lower risk did the new EASA rules deliver? At what cost to the industry?

How much lower risk did the new EASA rules deliver? At what cost to the industry?